| To: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs |
| From: | Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:44:34 +0800 |
| Cc: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DRBD DRIVER" <drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <575993EA.3010005@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1464615294-9946-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <575993EA.3010005@xxxxxxxxx> |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/30/2016 07:34 AM, Ming Lei wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset >> try to prepare for the support and do two things: >> >> 1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(), >> then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which >> can be thought as a good cleanup for lib/iov_iter.c >> >> 2) remove BIO_MAX_SECTORS and makre BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete, and >> now there is only one user for each. Once multipage bvecs is introduced, >> one bio may hold lots of sectors, and we should always use sort of >> BIO_MAX_VECS which should be introduced in future and is similiar >> with current BIO_MAX_PAGES. >> >> The only functional change is iterate_bvec():lib/iov_iter.c >> >> xfstests(-a auto) over loop aio is run for ext4/xfs to verify >> the change and no regression found with this patchset. > > > Added patches 1-7, still waiting for an answer on my reply to #8. Thanks for adding patches 1-7, and now I just found the added BIO_MAX_SIZE usage in dm-crypt.c is droped from next, so it is safe to kill it now. I will send a new patch #8 against for-4.8/core. Thanks, Ming > > -- > Jens Axboe > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] allow enabling reflinks at runtime, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH v3] mkfs: better error with incorrect b/s value suffix usage, Jan Tulak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs, Jens Axboe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Cumulative xfsrestore shows many warnings and files/directories are missing after restoration, Damien Gombault |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |