| To: | Xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mount options question |
| From: | Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:15:03 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6JCnedpCbsKucT31UmMHXCBUP9ZpxDVL9C2lLdYL1Jw=; b=HCp9D5vUtLOkdRs/eerHQfVkPbszgvPegJ5wzoBIKUT4ANqjd1jWXIRYaKDeRogqHr pSIo3M6sMyRZBXmzgEiptqgfH0oja4GR2UXcOEcFV1vOmrdwtWasSYLSvUNR3RQBPNFN 3kW5+czNyM95FhbahxgI9/I4KxbJE3RX+lBt9xjmoUxBAUUoCjqVZnL1NM07GKPdD/O2 ieX+s6Yh8D3QuB6fRix6paNt/AWz/OojgS3sK0i1sglkkBGvUXrPGusBQaBTc6WkPOuk qzePnFMCHVkTSU0ztcf9uGFVV+fESV86l6KRzqzIPekkOu/TMm35bdv+qT5Ny2fFVx0H VULQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <20140829083738.GD20518@dastard> |
| References: | <3dc9caf6f9b415f6e4c0ebac1f1626d3@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140827230732.GN20518@dastard> <CAAxjCEy9UyjDVrTZ4GdRyDy330wUqLGWurzrLAE6-7Q0KdYzvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140829083738.GD20518@dastard> |
>> Mostly agreed, but using "discard" would be a no-brainer for me. I >> suppose XFS does not automatically switch it on for non-rotational >> storage. > > Yup, you're not using your brain. :P > > mount -o discard *sucks* on so many levels it is not funny. I don't > recommend that anybody *ever* use it, on XFS, ext4 or btrfs. Just > use fstrim if you ever need to clean up a SSD. Good to know, thanks! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsrestore: use utimensat() to provide atime/mtime with ns resolution, Greg Freemyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Next by Thread: | [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.17-rc3, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |