xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: aborted SCSI commands while discarding/unmapping via mkfs.xfs

from [Stefan Ring] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: aborted SCSI commands while discarding/unmapping via mkfs.xfs
From: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:22:25 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zBokAhcTrzQrXp7ErkdEMmb7c4rbPFjxjp7qkFKlVZo=; b=JdPYIc8H23gD0Zfjmg9qmMgMbLiiaE6zF9ju+mgDTRNWfxq/jTeH8IU837ssrnr+R9 gQ5VpxUpTBFs5czMI0mTdSJmKmUp82zG4vDPNfvNoZxIBdeU07mXTem8Yt97gU76dgbG iJXRWy7mUTS1GJcRVcjWT5YRH8hqVX+G6t8v38JAu3+4pTdOk3WGTloOHTDvnR2h42BE YgYKX8I06q+J62yPNIwPXzEdbTMcAsletQVEHvefkG+aClTUXoyy50Ck7ZnFftLQGAgd LK8G8D2guvP4YqkXxd8NtDR3Xt4h34EUlKpBX4SK12ghFi/B0k4iuISQa/Q/YqfF0ux6 o7zg==
In-reply-to: <502B6884.2010402@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <502AB82D.9090408@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1850094.RmMErZaXcJ@saturn> <502B6884.2010402@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> right now a self build test system running http://www.nexenta.com/corp/.

With SAS disks or SATA? This seems to make a big difference regarding
how much a long-running operation can lock out concurrent accesses.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: aborted SCSI commands while discarding/unmapping via mkfs.xfs, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim, Tomas Racek
Previous by Thread:  Re: aborted SCSI commands while discarding/unmapping via mkfs.xfs, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Next by Thread:  Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/18] xfstests: move tests out of top level, Dave Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]