| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Data loss XFS with RT kernel on Debian. |
| From: | Jan de Kruyf <jan.de.kruyf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:24 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s9l9Bb3O/+QCl2+FCoDmmngAB1UzkFV8jvlXShM0zzU=; b=yL1PeupQ9C6Prg1ZnQlcbevf2xKqYGBuoubJ5ZOXdRN6lPGRxb5VaPALLoGYPm487P ZKlvfu7bH/AWMiJ9q/jUsDy1Wu6lpUQTFDbSQuBL4MrsoLBnA5W1hWinPWnLYaokAgt0 MBDRotOIJv/sbKIHr4q6yUXRAv7o4/AEHeoFLtkz8dmNliV+nDcN1Vy7SBrYcGw6yQci 53zIyKmvqvUajdVt8G8atJXEUI5FNOy+Ay5i0jFxLTopRK7/o7CRrd0lrzY0c9p2AT7A CUq9jjBGQPDULQb5Bvb/JCU2jTui1YTaOBkV5r9MdyoDOPr8XmLLxKzYOwRLuzRVRocu zpog== |
I did post the prob in the Austin Schuh thread in the RT mailing list. I believe they know what Austins problem is, but Thomas G. is a bit busy it seems at the moment. And I did start reading that thread also. In any case kernel 3.2-rt works great with good latencies, so we will stick to that for the time being. It was just 'feature inflation' that made me move to a later kernel. Not always a good idea. Thanks for your prompt answers. j. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/6] libxfs: reused invalidated buffers leak state and data, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | git clone over http? (specifically, for xfstest), Kaul, Yaniv |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Data loss XFS with RT kernel on Debian., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filesystem lockup with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, Thomas Gleixner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |