Re: Performance regression between 2.6.32 and 2.6.38

[Paul Saab <ps@xxxxxx>]

On 9/9/11 11:05 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:23:54PM -0600, Joshua Aune wrote:
>> Are there any mount options or other tests that can be run in the
>>failing configuration that would be helpful to isolate this further?
>
>The best thing would be to bisect it down to at least a kernel release,
>and if possible to a -rc or individual change (the latter might start
>to get hard due to various instabilities in early -rc kernels)

487f84f3 is where the regression was introduced.