Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing

To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:23:30 -0700
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cx62OMNXFkjnUd4zqlo0KmI2DytcdpqIafEDMNFj4vc=; b=gGda7fFKdJAGQEffLP5vLSt0pyfypLga2+bGAr9rlhzgp89B5sqCBSxkqjl4bCMjfv 3JwQ+ffrDok4sEMKZlA7FBEUdum4Y5GtGzxnRs5EDsgk5am0igN9CkSC46Nlr7tWcKv0 K1pi7d8SDoC0BzFai15wAhLrBa6JmmVeIZNg6EbvYV05JWapBWOlPZiMYmKbklDZZ6Vj 4Fx4Q91Gla+kDFEWOhlIy6apMG20tkgfRO1SqFCigYTTaCvj9+OamGCBTQa3OUzlmjxa G1Z7x2ULMZRgOGIgTYm89ylXYwjB/2O4wFSy6ciDr6k6V6xAvW0RY0Jec1rrkv+c25mr zc7Q==
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cx62OMNXFkjnUd4zqlo0KmI2DytcdpqIafEDMNFj4vc=; b=gIe2fSbHAnpzNl2SpFXa82dU4x0ZU1cf9bquJlv6gT6wq3eNOtgLrWjYgNRy/ZF3fX ih41rirrWMNCegawRpr1xEcvwtxZaJaeMpn5RUzWh6RrQmqsBAH8FJssLUYCge0LOD19 fzbg+hv3q5xeRFZwzdMRc7PL+uIBVoKq3sl44=
In-reply-to:	<20150324153306.GG4701@xxxxxxx>
References:	<1427113443-20973-1-git-send-email-mgorman@xxxxxxx> <20150324115141.GS28621@dastard> <20150324153306.GG4701@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	linus971@xxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:51:41PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>> So it looks like the patch set fixes the remaining regression and in
>> 2 of the four cases actually improves performance....
>
> \o/

W00t.

> Linus, these three patches plus the small fixlet for pmd_mkyoung (to match
> pte_mkyoung) is already in Andrew's tree. I'm expecting it'll arrive to
> you before 4.0 assuming nothing else goes pear shaped.

Yup. Thanks Mel,

                          Linus

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing, Mel Gorman [PATCH 2/3] mm: numa: Preserve PTE write permissions across a NUMA hinting fault, Mel Gorman [PATCH 3/3] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur, Mel Gorman [PATCH 1/3] mm: numa: Group related processes based on VMA flags instead of page table flags, Mel Gorman Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing, Mel Gorman Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing, Linus Torvalds <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 0/5 V2] xfs: RENAME_WHITEOUT support, Brian Foster
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: factor out xfs_rename_finish(), Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce system overhead of automatic NUMA balancing, Mel Gorman
Next by Thread:	Keep your home insulated with replacement windows xfs, Replacement Window xfs
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]