| To: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | fragmentation question |
| From: | Brady Chang <bchang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:45:41 -0700 |
| Accept-language: | en-US |
| Acceptlanguage: | en-US |
| Thread-index: | ActO7yl2Jk7cGohZVUmB1HbSY0PR7Q== |
| Thread-topic: | fragmentation question |
|
Hello All, I have an issue with fragmentation on a particular device thanks for any advice. -Brady I have a Dell r510 with 12 disks 2xraid 5 (6 disks each) raid group1: 48 GB carved out for os mounted as / remaining space 2.7 TB for xfs mounted as /data1 raid group2: 48 GB for swap remaining space 2.7 TB for xfs mounted as /data2 The strange thing is that /data1 never gets fragmented where as /data2 is badly fragmented. I believe increase allocsize would help, but not sure how to explain why /data2(/dev/sdd) always gets fragmented and not /data1(/dev/sdb) It's a data warehouse application. the I/O is balanced between /data1 and /data2: output of xfs_db [root@sdw4 data1]# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdb actual 14353, ideal 13702, fragmentation factor 4.54% [root@sdw4 data1]# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdd actual 408674, ideal 13719, fragmentation factor 96.64% df output /dev/sdb 2.7T 967G 1.8T 36% /data1 /dev/sdd 2.7T 1.1T 1.7T 39% /data2 LABEL=/data1 /data1 xfs allocsize=1048576,logbufs=8,noatime,nodiratime 0 0 LABEL=/data2 /data2 xfs allocsize=1048576,logbufs=8,noatime,nodiratime 0 0 raid config output: [root@sdw4 data1]# omreport storage vdisk List of Virtual Disks in the System Controller PERC H700 Integrated (Slot 4) ID : 0 Status : Ok Name : boot State : Ready Hot Spare Policy violated : Not Assigned Virtual Disk Bad Blocks : No Secured : Not Applicable Progress : Not Applicable Layout : RAID-5 Size : 48.99 GB (52602470400 bytes) Device Name : /dev/sda Bus Protocol : SAS Media : HDD Read Policy : No Read Ahead Write Policy : Force Write Back Cache Policy : Not Applicable Stripe Element Size : 128 KB Disk Cache Policy : Disabled ID : 1 Status : Ok Name : data1 State : Ready Hot Spare Policy violated : Not Assigned Virtual Disk Bad Blocks : No Secured : Not Applicable Progress : Not Applicable Layout : RAID-5 Size : 2,742.89 GB (2945150484480 bytes) Device Name : /dev/sdb Bus Protocol : SAS Media : HDD Read Policy : No Read Ahead Write Policy : Force Write Back Cache Policy : Not Applicable Stripe Element Size : 128 KB Disk Cache Policy : Disabled ID : 2 Status : Ok Name : swap State : Ready Hot Spare Policy violated : Not Assigned Virtual Disk Bad Blocks : No Secured : Not Applicable Progress : Not Applicable Layout : RAID-5 Size : 48.99 GB (52602470400 bytes) Device Name : /dev/sdc Bus Protocol : SAS Media : HDD Read Policy : No Read Ahead Write Policy : Force Write Back Cache Policy : Not Applicable Stripe Element Size : 128 KB Disk Cache Policy : Disabled ID : 3 Status : Ok Name : data2 State : Ready Hot Spare Policy violated : Not Assigned Virtual Disk Bad Blocks : No Secured : Not Applicable Progress : Not Applicable Layout : RAID-5 Size : 2,742.89 GB (2945150484480 bytes) Device Name : /dev/sdd Bus Protocol : SAS Media : HDD Read Policy : No Read Ahead Write Policy : Force Write Back Cache Policy : Not Applicable Stripe Element Size : 128 KB Disk Cache Policy : Disabled |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: remove the ->kill_root btree operation, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fragmentation question, Brady Chang |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: remove the ->kill_root btree operation, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fragmentation question, Brady Chang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |