xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs performance tuning

To: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs performance tuning
From: "Wendy Cheng" <s_wendy_cheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:29:56 -0400
Cc: "xfs mailing list" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3512.1054466831@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <BAY2-DAV57lTbOzrPC40003086a@hotmail.com> <20030602230713.GC714@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Great thanks ! - but these are kind of obivous.
Are there more ? :). Could I turn off  / delay
kupdated and assume that when incore log buffers
are full, it would be automatically flushed into
disk without kupdated's help ?  We have lots 
of memory to spare and have turned on highmem IO.

Wendy
---------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
To: "Wendy Cheng" <s_wendy_cheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xfs mailing list" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: xfs performance tuning


| On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:15:11PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
| > We're trying out XFS using SPECsfs benchmark and 
| > could only get ~ half of the IOPS when compared
| > with EXT2. It might not be a fair comparison since EXT2 
| > is not a journaling file system but would love to know
| > any tuning parameter to boost the number. Could someone
| > help out ? Thanks...
| 
| I would suggest starting with the mkfs options "-l size=XXX" and
| "-i size=XXX" (log size and inode size).  Increasing the number
| of incore log buffers you're using ("-o logbufs=XXX" mount option)
| might help you too.
| 
| cheers.
| 
| -- 
| Nathan
| 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>