| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] xfsprogs: fixes a regression hang in xfs_repair phase 4 |
| From: | Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 May 2011 11:09:32 +0530 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mQZJmKZGCGMijXcKZKfnx6vd08x5IdGxST6kPn6GVsw=; b=CzHdiclG5K46Wf+Hapzv2k5OrLCQPxT/kULwkTQ5KKQY3LnqobWt0vzfhSvY9lslJD EQqDX9749/Qp4RBjoylZQ5P6SSgoaDx8eDCgeVACTlKsJoAwGhgwdOKEBnrrwdAwPXYV jfHXduC2JwwYjYjsCrL6A9uQVc5x7idpzR/xo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=b1ZF0LVKjsllJNrPyZNpKmdhbyHYekKoIboEXv/afg4WTCxOsRa578sbXpAC9F+Oez kzfsec0t/Re6yVZ4I56GZU2zTz8CAERLugyDmNQcdi3ANNrVaqOumqb9x8SxBe4wIoDF k1pLVZPFlZ7nWWURorN+VxZRLrAz2hw7mHKd0= |
| In-reply-to: | <BANLkTinfqmqPTuLFDW_jv_Dn4jNsP5gLcQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BANLkTikBSadR7K2RfiS2k60nEOPncaDfyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110422065120.GB14189@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTi=3V0TohK6c6MYOvPQc3ADd_Pya3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTinfqmqPTuLFDW_jv_Dn4jNsP5gLcQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
It will be fine for me, if you have received the xfs_metadump file I sent in last mail. I am sure it will help you find problem in repair btree, please correct me if I left you anything from my side. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for delay, please find attached the xfs_metadump of xfs file system > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> Sorry for delay, please find the metadump of file system. >> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> The patch looks good to me. But I'm a bit worried about the lack of >>> test coverage. As Eric said if you're able to get a metadump of >>> a filesystem that shows this issue it would come in useful for >>> regression testing. >>> >>> >> > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks, Christian Kujau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfstests 013 - 2.6.35.11 - hang, Ajeet Yadav |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: op-journaled fs, journal size and storage speeds, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] xfsprogs: fixes a regression hang in xfs_repair phase 4, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |