| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS umount issue |
| From: | Nuno Subtil <subtil@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2011 01:08:11 -0700 |
| Cc: | Paul Anderson <pha@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZX92zD+Ow/cIpTOIresSwpaRl81rjhbic7Ysb8Y+WHo=; b=eHxmMoE47dIaJkAn/LyGAML9ePHFLgja/OViBmb2uHGVZiqpFLYzOTmM9UoZJgRgK4 s0F1KCmX9kAhQ4ISbK3M/8gx8050XJGBhjs1WCyyaH3e9EfC75Vzmzzz2AcYWfKdchul QhlnM07M2Jn+Yqq0p5hp96JakWyOOUNOYqSPY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kmPq73ccz6yImUrASP0pXl6ufXdbkFWrL87G5/2LLr3V/uVzCpDZQKZt7LSs+X94hk zw0gO9A8jZ9CJo1PWlilvyQ3NU3x6U8Q51yxVJNE6ZKjrjMuRzFzcI5w2nZMybQppEWE E7+uoJTl3YlVA4vV1pSRbybUvHNOfC93O+TnY= |
| In-reply-to: | <20110525002947.GK32466@dastard> |
| References: | <BANLkTikNMrFzxJF4a86ZM55r3D=ThPFmOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTin26bRHiaCxc15ZwjX__NR3QHaSFA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTimOA3W2V+0uPsjpPt=MqrbeGcfs5g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110525002947.GK32466@dastard> |
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 17:29, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... >> Mine is a Netgear Stora. The interesting bit is that the stock >> firmware runs kernel 2.6.22.18 and uses XFS as well, but I don't know >> how stable it was to begin with. > > Have you checked to see whether there are extra patches added to > that kernel by Netgear? It's not uncommon for these embedded systems > to run a kernel that has been patched to fix problems that you are > seeing. I looked through it and didn't see anything that stood out, although I could have easily missed it (the diff is quite noisy, plus it sounds like the vmap cache invalidation functions have changed names in the meantime?). The one interesting bit that I found was that the Netgear kernel comments out the test that disables write barriers at mount time, which I found quite odd, but it sounds unrelated to this issue. Nuno |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add test 254 for testing basic btrfs volume functionality, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS umount issue, Nuno Subtil |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS umount issue, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.38-10134-gbf59170, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |