| To: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs didn't provide redundancy for citical data structure? |
| From: | hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 May 2010 23:57:51 +0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gdKLIerdKXQ/k8p3DOKo7644byg36YNgTNzqeVgKmB0=; b=NshywlzLhb9RwwuF8H4diNJ/lZ8jKKrNgPEMzLBwvgTsn69pLAdtOmqBfPw+y8cPFc mPzIEEmFjfoN1r8ssJUP0UvgGkJES/gs1Tv3g3r3oklYNy1L37sHJRaXeh1KLlt6Nqcq n08e4vrQwIllx2gv8pSNXii71MgBuRDBvHTwc= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qgENQ4iW93lx/ph4B3xKib3Xt2PqMKVCihn5DRyl22MHzTEhGKaYUGN6VMvWep8vOc 5HlENc1uOUfADs+aPwJTDW3u4v1QXq0hr3Si6bFRGpbqmXbmkf1QUq1B6HVecszoiH7S cy1ydnXRhdnUJJxLu8JzZ6zDt96twWJcYbpLc= |
I read this paper: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~vshree/xfs.pdf, which says xfs didn't provide redundancy for citical data structure, such as mirror, parity. I wonder if it is so? If it is, is there plan to implement that for XFS developers? -- The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Welcome to the nffbby group, nffbby Moderator |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defrag in shrinkers, Ed Tomlinson |
| Previous by Thread: | Welcome to the nffbby group, nffbby Moderator |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs didn't provide redundancy for citical data structure?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |