| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes |
| From: | James Braid <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:03:28 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101008225146.GJ4681@dastard> |
| References: | <AANLkTinwnOm0V=9WwbXiUGFnyjCwT3GUHo0hiQahQNUV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101008225146.GJ4681@dastard> |
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 23:51, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sounds like fragmented free space. What is the output of:
>
> # xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" <device>
# xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s" /dev/sdb
from to extents blocks pct
1 1 2298052 2298052 40.52
2 3 1568338 3337017 58.84
4 7 8432 35716 0.63
8 15 50 423 0.01
total free extents 3874872
total free blocks 5671208
average free extent size 1.46359
Which seems to say there are a few tiny pieces of free space
available? The files that were failing to be written were a few
hundred bytes in size.
We haven't seen any errors so far today, but xfs_fsr ran over the
weekend, so perhaps I guess it's reorganized the filesystem.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Confidential Business Relationship, mrs susan shabangu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ENOSPC at 90% with plenty of inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |