xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: A blocksize problem about dax and ext4

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: A blocksize problem about dax and ext4
From: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:26:18 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: Cholerae Hu <choleraehyq@xxxxxxxxx>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, "adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx" <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151224101111.GA6438@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAM=YXF-aXxp19=uFDExUswpEfKXNN6LJScxAB-7-u-AgRiXJ2g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAPcyv4gYHuSWuugnELSO6B1rye+b89io3zJVUXwRt0wE1ZfPrA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295BEC985F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151224000021.GU19802@dastard> <CAM=YXF9Dt-BuY9yM7d023a16gp=edGHeCDVTCwV-AEotj6sbFg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAPcyv4g1eHgm8oUvxFaJkRD-T7jAyw95FQ-q3_GC2JU_kkU-Kg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAM=YXF-wZEhodxVRN8nqyH9Vg7t85ut2-0PnEn9OvhpG_jX3mA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295BEC9CDD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151224101111.GA6438@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQHRPXn8bxToPOnbsUmlb/yBrXUup57Y0FsAgAA5STCAADeRgIAACZyAgAAGkACAABtSgIAAAlzAgAB80ICAACTYoA==
Thread-topic: A blocksize problem about dax and ext4

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 4:11 AM
> Subject: Re: A blocksize problem about dax and ext4
> 
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 02:47:07AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Persistent
> Memory) wrote:
> > > Did you mean that I should make the blocksize bigger until the mount
> > > command tell me that dax is enabled?
> >
> > To really use DAX, the filesystem block size must match the
> > system CPU's page size, which is probably 4096 bytes.
> 
> No, it doesn't.  File you use for DAX must be aligne at page size
> granularity.  For XFS you could do this with the per-inode extent
> size hint for example even if the overall block size is smaller.

I think that's a future goal.

Currently, the checks are like this:

        if (sb->s_blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) {
                xfs_alert(mp,
                "Filesystem block size invalid for DAX Turning DAX off.");


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>