xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim

from [Tommy van Leeuwen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
From: Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:06:57 +0200
Cc: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bas Couwenberg <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=0tp1+1NpjmJN0z27v+AMTpdunnAI1+bc/Kg+IZmC8N8=; b=cqwmpltUCzpcZ5jSSO0IpNcGwLZwT9xqe4favJMqf+jPhGG0HbaI7DsxyvG9VbroRj 58SevBqjeOUFpCV9Q+OJYxCORVW4tibrmItQtcZC/HJLks7NxRNbTAqeSQtuiyj2J09f qgG2VwE0bTkT4xsHSGu4LZaLRhe0N3F8UXclE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=LzWy8XkvOR6lFHV6fkfpJyjYb964yfgirxBqREdvWmqY7drJ/cnBkVCyGlFb5CFBy3 hXUZxx3p0TicEhtmUlAM7/EFWVCxN4/EB346gRafZaygN5H79jKxuHcQusvfJ3fHwV7M H5kFHv5KBsaLE2WYcmRqJRK6K11zPYCE2uCIo=
In-reply-to: <20091012233854.GA29446@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090930124104.GA7463@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC60D27.9060703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091005214348.GA15448@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ACB080D.3010708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091007011926.GB32032@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD18C8D.90808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091012233854.GA29446@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: chiparus@xxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 09:43:09AM +0200, Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>> Hello Christoph,
>>
>> Attached you'll find a screenshot from a 2.6.31.3 server, which includes
>> your patches and has XFS_DEBUG turned on. I truly hope this is useful to
>> you.
>
> Thanks.  The patch below should fix the inode reclaim race that could
> lead to the double free you're seeing.  To be applied ontop of all
> the other patches I sent you.

Hi Christoph,

Here are 2 more crashes with this patch applied, both having xfs_debug
on and showing different traces (not inode reclaim related?). Hope
it's usefull.

Cheers,
Tommy

Attachment: sb08-20091014.jpg
Description: JPEG image

Attachment: sb07-20091015.jpg
Description: JPEG image

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  UNITED NATION, United Nations
Next by Date:  Re: Wrapped journal record corruption on read at recovery - patch attached (was Re: XFS corruption with failover), Andy Poling
Previous by Thread:  Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]