| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and MD devices. |
| From: | Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:14:22 +1000 |
| Cc: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030429225008.GA653@frodo> (Nathan Scott's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:50:08 +1000") |
| References: | <87sms1jtot.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <yq11xzlwfab.fsf@austin.mkp.net> <20030429225008.GA653@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.5 (cabbage) |
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> Daniel> I think tried to create an XFS filesystem on it and,
>> Daniel> annoyingly, got told that my MD array was not clean.
>>
>> Hrm, I agree that the degraded RAID1 case is valid. As long as the
>> array is operational, we shouldn't care. Printing the warning would
>> suffice.
>>
>> Nathan?
>
> This has been the behavior for a couple of weeks now (since the
> 2.4.6 version of xfsprogs).
Thanks. I note I didn't mention that this was the Debian 2.4.4 package.
Anyway, it's good to know that other people will not have the same
problem I did.
Daniel
--
I wish I had boobs. Not enough to buy them, though.
-- Lara Flynn Boyle
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - dmapi/xfsprogs configure updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raid5: switching cache buffer size, Danny Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and MD devices., Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | fsck.xfs not found, Adam H. Pendleton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |