| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: altering defaults |
| From: | prad <prad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:26:27 -0700 |
| Cancel-lock: | sha1:/voFZdApuY6Jgba7QDWrxraSpGI= |
| References: | <8762onaq19.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4DEC4DE0.5090503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If space efficiency is a consideration then smaller blocksizes might > be useful. Not so much for hits per day, but for how many files you > expect to store at any one time; you'll waste ((blocksize / 2) * nr > files) on average. > space is not likely an issue at all. if there is no efficiency issue the usage of 4096 bytes hardly seems significant. so thx eric and michael for your input on this! we'll leave things alone. :D -- in friendship, prad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fwd: [XFSTEST Add Fallocate Punch Hole Tests 1/3 v4] Add Punch Hole to FSX, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fwd: [XFSTEST Add Fallocate Punch Hole Tests 1/3 v4] Add Punch Hole to FSX, Allison Henderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: altering defaults, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: XFS TESTS: Add Fallocate Punch Hole Test v4 Changes, Allison Henderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |