FYI:
Its also in the IXDP425 as well as the IQ80321. These are two
completely different boards the only thing in common really is the
Xscale core.
Greg Ungerer posted a patch that I echoed. One problem is that is
appears to be and issue with a calculation. The comment seems to
indicate that the variable used should be 'namelen' but instead is
'count'
One thing to consider here - the x86 is Little endian. We are BE on the
IXP425
RR
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vinesh Christopher
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:40 AM
> To: 'Nathan Scott'; Vinesh Christopher
> Cc: 'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: Bug : XFS - XSCALE "Directory Not Empty"
>
>
> It works on x86 platforms for me. The problem is
> With the XSCALE board.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:11 PM
> To: Vinesh Christopher
> Cc: 'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: Bug : XFS - XSCALE "Directory Not Empty"
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:14:58PM -0500, Vinesh Christopher wrote:
> >
> > Intel IQ80321 (Xscale) Evaluation Board
> > Running Linux 2.6.0 with -rmk2 patches
> > xfsprogs_2.6.3-1 is taken from debian
> >
> > I did the following
> >
> > # mkfs.xfs /dev/sda1
> > # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
> > # cd /mnt
> > # mkdir t
> > # cp /lib/* t
> > # rm -r -f t
> > rm: cannot remove directory 't' : Directory not empty
> > #
>
> Any errors on your console or in your system logs?
>
> I tried this locally and (not really surprisingly) it works
> just fine on my system.
>
> > I tried with 2.4.21 and XFS 1.3.1 patches -> same problem
>
> Uhrm, odd - there are lots of people using XFS from that kernel.
> I'm inclined to suspect your hardware at this stage.
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
>
>
|