| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less). |
| From: | James Braid <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:32:20 +0000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20071031154111.GA14956@puku.stupidest.org> |
| References: | <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> <47267EC7.8000906@sgi.com> <177CA06B-41D3-4E4A-9EA6-5688C952CD63@loreland.org> <20071031154111.GA14956@puku.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 31 Oct 2007, at 15:41, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:05:09AM +0000, James Braid wrote:
This particular filesystem is used for nearline backups from a bunch of NFS servers (which run XFS as well - we love XFS). The average file size is only about a megabyte. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Niv Sardi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., James Braid |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |