| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: new xfs git tree |
| From: | Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:14:03 -0600 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090126224130.53949fda.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090119011601.GA14708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090126224130.53949fda.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for a "maintainer" to respond..Should we include that in linux-next? As a new maintainer, I confirm that official xfs repository git://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/xfs/xfs was synced with kernel.org repo at one point and is being updated with the new patches on a regular basis. AFAIK, it's up-to-date now. Felix |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS, Mikulas Patocka |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_admin: exit gracefully for non-XFS fileststems, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: new xfs git tree, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-11545-gf3b8436, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |