xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux

To: Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux
From: Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:33:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201151559270.15987-100000@sasami.anime.net> (Dan Hollis's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:01:28 -0800 (PST)")
Mail-followup-to: Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201151559270.15987-100000@sasami.anime.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
begin  Dan Hollis quotation:

> Its too bad theres no signal mechanism for userspace for 'memory
>low', eg SIGLOWMEM so userspace apps could voluntarily release
>resources to ease memory pressure.

There was a big discussion on LKML about that a few months back.  I
forget what the outcome was.

-- 
 /////////////////  |                  | The spark of a pin
<sneakums@xxxxxxxx> |  (require 'gnu)  | dropping, falling feather-like.
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  |                  | There is too much noise.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>