Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS

[Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx>]

begin  Eric Sandeen quotation:

> On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 17:36, drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alp ATICI wrote:
>> 
>> > Which patch should we apply to the kernel first?
>> My general rule is to apply bigger, more intrusive patches first, so I do
>> XFS before preemption.
>> 
> I did it this way (XFS first) and I don't recall any problems.  If
> there was a merge conflict, it was trivial to resolve.

The preempt patch has been applying cleanly to SGI's CVS tree for me
since I started using it, round about the .15 pre-patches.  It works
great, too.

-- 
 /////////////////  |                  | The spark of a pin
<sneakums@xxxxxxxx> |  (require 'gnu)  | dropping, falling feather-like.
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  |                  | There is too much noise.