[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12]

To: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12]
From: "Stefan Smietanowski" <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST)
Reply-to: stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Check this. It might be good to have a look at either moving XFS into 2.5
directly and aim for 2.6 as the definitive time OR to start porting the
thing to Alan's AC tree

// Stefan

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12
From: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article
<Pine.LNX.4.33.0110110058550.1198-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus
Torvalds  <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>So I made a 2.4.12, and renamed away the sorry excuse for a kernel that
>2.4.11 was.
> - Tim Waugh: parport update

... which is broken.

Not a good week.

On the other hand, the good news is that I'll open 2.5.x RSN, just
because Alan is so much better at maintaining things ;)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>