On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 04:22 AM, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
>> That's what I've read first, but someone showed me a sample where it works.
>> He just told me he was using project quota. However, does it make sense ?
>> I've also read somewhere else that quota is never enforced for root user
>> (id,gid=0) that's why I was testing it ....
>
> No, it doesn't make sense. Why would you want to enforce quotas for root?
A week ago I tried this and project quotas appear to apply to root.
[root@localhost project_quota_test1]# xfs_quota -c df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Pathname
/dev/sdb 83845120 157980 83687140 0% /xfs_local
/dev/sdb 102400 124928 9223372036854753280 122%
/xfs_local/project_quota_test1
[root@localhost project_quota_test1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test100MB bs=1M
count=100
dd: error writing ‘test100MB’: No space left on device
79+0 records in
78+0 records out
81788928 bytes (82 MB) copied, 0.163849 s, 499 MB/s
[root@localhost project_quota_test1]# xfs_quota -c df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Pathname
/dev/sdb 83845120 237748 83607372 0% /xfs_local
/dev/sdb 102400 204800 9223372036854673408 200%
/xfs_local/project_quota_test1
The available space value seems like a bug, at least it’s not a sane/helpful
value. But I do get a no space left on device, and the file being written is
truncated at the hard limit for that project (directory).
Chris Murphy
|