| To: | "L.A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:45:07 -0700 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <55C55265.4080309@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <55C41D75.4040504@xxxxxxxxx> <55C43B70.4050300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <55C468F0.2040707@xxxxxxxxx> <20150807225531.GG3902@dastard> <55C55265.4080309@xxxxxxxxx> |
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:50 PM, L.A. Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Dave Chinner wrote: > >> xfsprogs 3.1.11 doesn't support CRCs. 3.2.0 was the first version of >> xfsprogs to support CRCs, and 3.2.1 (IIRC) was the first to support >> finobt, so the make binary came from a different build to the xfs_db >> binary that xfs_admin executes. > ---- > I'll have to do some research on this. > > Q: should the versions of xfsdump&restore be the same as the rest of the > xfsprogs? Nope, they are separate packages with separate versioning. -Eric > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fs: create and use seq_show_option for escaping, Serge E. Hallyn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, L.A. Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, L.A. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options?, L.A. Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |