| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 |
| From: | Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:45:15 +0300 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tibor@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r3FzwxfGcaZ8dL6qbrzI1AtldyXEdZeiUCmBywzeXqOD/ZHG61Gn7rSe8hq2h4dfnydpRrekMbPAZ1VFDZ7p+mo7rcyKAeVxhsiXUIQIDmSqAwRqtK1eJkolZpzzRZg+ondvjm595vnv+7PO64Q/vFC1fHy2tc1TbnBqTduXNXg= |
| In-reply-to: | <20050714143830.GA17842@infradead.org> |
| References: | <1120756552.5298.10.camel@pc299.sam-solutions.net> <20050708042146.GA1679@frodo> <60868aed0507130822c2e9e97@mail.gmail.com> <20050714012048.GB937@frodo> <60868aed050714065047e3aaec@mail.gmail.com> <20050714143830.GA17842@infradead.org> |
| Reply-to: | Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>:
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > > > I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still
> > > > not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks?
> > >
> > > Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure
> > > looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so
> > > perhaps its fixed by now).
> >
> > AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at
> > linux-xfs,
> > maybe add something like this:
> >
> > #ifdef XSCALE
> > /* We need this because some gcc versions for xscale are broken. */
> > [patched version here]
> > #else
> > [original version here]
> > #endif
>
> no, just fix your compiler or let the gcc folks do it. Did anyone of
> the arm folks ever open a PR at the gcc bugzilla with a reproduced
> testcase? You're never get your compiler fixed with that attitude.
Yes, but a lof of people use older versions of compilers and suffer
from this bug.
I personally was very unhappy when lost my data.
Best regards,
Yura
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |