[PATCH 0/4] fix (mostly) minor nits spotted by gcc sanitization

To:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[PATCH 0/4] fix (mostly) minor nits spotted by gcc sanitization
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:23:34 -0500
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

newer gcc supports -fsanitize=undefined, which spits out
errors when the code does something ... undefined.

These are a handful of the (IMHO) obvious and unobtrusive
fixes that knock down the noise.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/4] fix (mostly) minor nits spotted by gcc sanitization, Eric Sandeen <= [PATCH 1/4] libxfs: avoid negative (and full-width) shifts in radix-tree.c, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 1/4] libxfs: avoid negative (and full-width) shifts in radix-tree.c, Brian Foster [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Brian Foster Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs_repair: fix unaligned accesses, Dave Chinner

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: clarify lock ordering comment, Ross Zwisler
Next by Date:	[PATCH 1/4] libxfs: avoid negative (and full-width) shifts in radix-tree.c, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfs: clarify lock ordering comment, Ross Zwisler
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 1/4] libxfs: avoid negative (and full-width) shifts in radix-tree.c, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]