xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308
From: angelo <angelo70@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:16:57 +0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5ramiK0dmvEjlGLXY/Qok2aYY4Q10g0dUsr6V4CvSRk=; b=VWJ8YhLP2g0ZA7YIi2127TnhQxCuBolv1LCGjt2CC9HxLe/iOg0xyoH+BlPDpl4b2M yjM4qZTkSto9730WWlzCaieqlh5wLHS9044Zv3Nc/H94O/CyDyiKfDGoMBGkGhPwOsV6 sNwYYmUT+R/IJ8jwm7U5YToLMdyrqql4vZXVLR4FsrcGSy0ygG/gd7Hpv5D+WHqft7gN y4wJDmA0K0QoSNvKJ28UR8hR7bxbYGtv2+NfWN8JHdD2WRIxvH0M1om1+WfAaeEjoOAf rWVKjfVmM6xIPR7UE7PU6wzVKP5ztnBN+R/f0sxTzQ0GIXFrb2xmvQlhCFDJkLD7cC5d Bc+A==
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
Hi all,

working on arm (32bit arch), kernel 4.1.6.
Looking to find the reason of a bad result on xfstests,

-tests/generic/009
------------------
i get several "all holes" messages

generic/009 [ 842.949643] run fstests generic/009 at 2015-09-18 15:29:36 - output mismatch (see /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/009.out    2015-09-17 10:54:06.689071257 +0000
+++ /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad 2015-09-18 15:29:41.412784177 +0000
    @@ -1,79 +1,45 @@
     QA output created by 009
         1. into a hole
    -0: [0..7]: hole
    -1: [8..23]: unwritten
    -2: [24..39]: hole
    +0: [0..39]: hole
     daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032

also some other tests are giving the same bad notices.


-tests/generic/308
------------------

I have now: CONFIG_LBDAF=y

In my target device this test creates a 16 Terabytes file 308.tempfile

-rw------- 1 root root  17592186044415 Sep 18 09:40 testfile.308

While "df" is not complaining about:

/dev/mmcblk0p5   8378368   45252   8333116   1% /media/p5

and next rm -f on it hands the cpu to 95%, forever.

This issue seems known from a long time, as it has been discussed in the thread:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00273.html

I was wondering if there was any special reason why the Jeff patch has
never been finally applied.

I applied this patch anyway, and tests pass.


Best regards,
Angelo Dureghello

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>