| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | swalloc/allocsize question |
| From: | Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:27:03 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1vkcPD4xIfbQ6q4JgpW08ZXgjf3O/6k86JcRlLJX71s=; b=prisBZKRAZKifsTnn+lMiq2+4KMGPRCDaBgXhMNROz6XOi6XOFpAXTG2jWWR1/022u f34pGAwXt+wlFD0xamdJCdLwyQ94VCpvHstBv6xx10HohWFfnFWIGRf3wn2LQh9pX9iD UAbDxoZl7IqreR613Oe2Dt6Ud0WuQTjoRoOJcrYRYuYOJg8dIYFSIkEWsA+e4210qEFO LA7EFWCPbznxKsiveFC/AGZgdxaecKw7pfGCC16D7BNe7v1COEnqBSjgc9fPJTvMxRAd i+phEEHM9zSlrq1vRxL9ibPrETpB8nF6X4W1+wHNeM73dhU2Iix0TYO5vJPyRljV/2Qk Ui5w== |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
Hi folks:I've noticed some "odd" behavior while experimenting with xfs mounts on relatively recent kernels (3.18 series). Basically, the swalloc,allocsize=x options are being modified to something different. That is: root@usn-04:~/burn-in/fio# uname -r 3.18.12.scalableroot@usn-04:~/burn-in/fio# mount -o inode64,noatime,nodiratime,swalloc,allocsize=1280k /dev/sda /data/1 root@usn-04:~/burn-in/fio# mount | grep sda/dev/sda on /data/1 type xfs (rw,noatime,nodiratime,swalloc,attr2,inode64,allocsize=256k,noquota) This is a hardware RAID6 with a 128k chunk size and 12 elements (so 10 data drives, thus the 1280k allocsize for stripe width allocation). Is this something specific to xfs itself, or is this an issue in the mount tools ? FWIW: we are using xfs-tools 3.2.2, kernel 3.18.12. I've also seen this with the 3.10 series though, so I am not sure where to look to track this down. Any guidance/suggestion? Thanks! Joe joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Nevermind (RTFMP): swalloc/allocsize question, Joe Landman |
| Previous by Thread: | 代/开――发/票, 93193 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: swalloc/allocsize question, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |