| To: | Rui Gomes <rgomes@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:44:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | omar <omar@xxxxxx>, xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <410959445.428221.1426083973347.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <54FDFEDC.5090106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1061986380.422955.1426008424991.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxx> <54FF2BBF.7060404@xxxxxxxxxxx> <410959445.428221.1426083973347.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxx> |
On 3/11/15 10:26 AM, Rui Gomes wrote: > Hello Eric, > > Thank you for the quick reply yesterday, I got to try the new patched version > today, > and we have now a segmentation fault at a different stage of the repair \o/ > Full output plus gdb traceback in the attachment. If you have 4k sectors, you might need this patch from the list: [PATCH] xfs: superblock buffers need to be sector sized http://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=142476196802097&w=2 as it's not merged yet. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size, Rui Gomes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size, Rui Gomes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size, Rui Gomes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size, Rui Gomes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |