| To: | yy <yy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS buffer IO performance is very poor |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:08:16 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <tencent_39AFE52BC5E06F89B6B2B3ED@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <tencent_39AFE52BC5E06F89B6B2B3ED@xxxxxx> |
On 2/11/15 1:39 AM, yy wrote: <snip> (In addition to Brian's questions): > XFS format parametes: > > #mkfs.xfs -d su=256k,sw=5 /dev/sdb1 > > #cat /proc/mounts > > /dev/sdb1 /data1 xfs > rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,nobarrier,logbsize=256k,sunit=512,swidth=2560,noquota > 0 0 > > #fdisk -ul > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdb1 128 2929356359 1464678116 83 Linux so 128*512 = 64k; your partition doesn't start on a 256k stripe unit boundary, right? Shouldn't it do so? -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: Accounting for AGFL blocks in xfs_spaceman, Dhruvesh Rathore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] xfs: xfs_spaceman utility rework, Dhruvesh Rathore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS buffer IO performance is very poor, Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS buffer IO performance is very poor, yy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |