| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Virtual Block device resize corrupts XFS |
| From: | Spelic <spelic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:42:00 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <54692E48.80708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5468FC60.10901@xxxxxx> <20141116223630.GH23575@dastard> <54692E48.80708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 17/11/2014 00:07, Spelic wrote: Not true! Depends on the allocation strategy chosen for LVM and the position of free space. Probably recovering LVM conf from backups (which usually is automatically made) can recover the exact LVM layout of prior to the shrink. Sorry by bad... he is not using LVM. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Virtual Block device resize corrupts XFS, Spelic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add support to RENAME_EXCHANGE flag V7, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Virtual Block device resize corrupts XFS, Spelic |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Virtual Block device resize corrupts XFS, Markus Rhonheimer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |