xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4

To: "Russell Cattelan" <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4
From: "Simon Matter" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1059169471.34654.113.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com>
References: <1059169471.34654.113.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1
Russel,

May I propose a little change in the package name for future releases.
IIRC rpm considers kernel-2.4.20-18.9XFS1.3.0pre4 older than
kernel-2.4.20-18.9. Now if you 'rpm -Fvh *' in a directory which includes
errata rpms, the original RedHat kernel is installed even if you already
upgraded to the new XFS release, which is not what you want.
If you change the release to kernel-2.4.20-18.9.XFS1.3.0pre4, it doesn't
happen again.

Regards,
Simon

> The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are
> available at:
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/
>
> The 1.3 xfs-cmds have also been updated to TOT xfs-cmds, since
> there is no real reason not to bring them in sync. In other works
> no major code changes, just a lot of cleanups and minor bug fixes.
>
> One significant update: xfs_copy is now installed by default.
>
> The kernel rpm's themselves have not had much testing so use
> at your own risk.
>
> As far as the xfs codes goes, it goes through nightly regression
> testing.
>
> As always please let us know of any issues.
> If things go well pre4 should probably turn into actual XFS 1.3.0
>
> -Russell Cattelan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>