| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage? |
| From: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:49:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard> |
| References: | <540986B1.4080306@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140905123058.GA29710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5409AF40.10801@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140905230528.GO20473@dastard> <540AB933.4030707@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140906150412.GB23506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140906225654.GB9955@dastard> <540D6A6C.9090801@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
Am 08.09.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Dave Chinner: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> Thanks, >> >> upgraded to 3.16.2 and xfsprogs 3.2.1. Let's see how it behaves with finobt. > > You need to mkfs the filesystem to use finobt - it's not something > that an upgrade will just switch on. i.e. > > # mkfs.xfs -m crc=1,finobt=1 <dev> Sure i also did a reformat using "-m crc=1,finobt=1". Stefan > Cheers, > > Dave. > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/051: test buffer use after free race on I/O failure in XFS log recovery, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage?, Brian Foster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |