xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:20:00 -0600
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52EAA5E9.8020402@xxxxxxx>
References: <201401201822.48520.arekm@xxxxxxxx> <52E6A9A2.1010905@xxxxxxx> <20140128044216.GI2212@dastard> <201401281829.49414.arekm@xxxxxxxx> <52EAA5E9.8020402@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 
On 1/30/14, 1:20 PM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Hey Arkadiusz,
> 
> 
> On 01/28/2014 11:29 AM, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 of January 2014, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>>> f3d3dae... libxfs: fix root inode handling inconsistencies
>>>
>>> Introduces this compiler warning in db/init.c:
>>>
>>> init.c: In function ÂinitÂ:
>>> init.c:152:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
>>> Âxfs_initialize_perag_data [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> Probably revert this one, right?
> 
> Just a compiler warning which does not happen in the master branch.

well, let's get it fixed anyway.

moving the prototype to include/xfs_mount.h fixes it up.

-Eric
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RFC] A draft for making ext4 support project quota, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] xfs: sanitize sb_inopblock in xfs_mount_validate_sb, Brian Foster
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7, Rich Johnston
Next by Thread:  Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7, Rich Johnston
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]