[PATCH RFC] xfsprogs: suggest "-d" option for repair of RO mount

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

How dangerous is dangerous?

We could offer the suggestion of a "-d" repair, if we're
in single-user mode with the root fs mounted readonly.

This change suggests -d to repair any RO mounted fs.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/repair/init.c b/repair/init.c
index c3f380b..a7a7613 100644
--- a/repair/init.c
+++ b/repair/init.c
@@ -97,8 +97,17 @@ xfs_init(libxfs_init_t *args)
        else
                args->isreadonly = LIBXFS_EXCLUSIVELY;
 
-       if (!libxfs_init(args))
+       if (!libxfs_init(args)) {
+               /* would -d be an option? */
+               if (!no_modify && !dangerously) {
+                       args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE |
+                                           LIBXFS_DANGEROUSLY);
+                       if (libxfs_init(args))
+                               fprintf(stderr,
+_("Unmount or use -d to repair a read-only mounted filesystem\n"));
+               }
                do_error(_("couldn't initialize XFS library\n"));
+       }
 
        ts_create();
        increase_rlimit();