| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest failures |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:02:33 -0600 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131107140004.GA9489@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107140004.GA9489@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
On 11/7/13, 8:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> We had a really high rate of change there for a while, and keeping up on >> all fronts was tough. >> >> There's been a bit of defensiveness in the replies here; let's get past >> that & take Christoph's list of failures and just get them taken care of. >> >> I'll try to go through the failures and either pick up existing patches, >> or get new ones written, and get a new series on the list to get this all >> cleaned up. > > It also would be use if everyone could resend patches more than say 2 > weeks old that haven't moved forward or outright rejected. > That's probably a better plan than having me confuse things by cobbling together a new series from multiple authors. So for now I'll retract my offer. ;) But let's get stuff reposted as needed and get it done. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: fix unlock in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |