xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: xfstest failures

from [Mark Tinguely] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:24:53 -0600
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 
On 11/07/13 02:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:



xfs/206

        Does not expect the ftype flag.  Didn't we change a generic
        filter to take care of this?


xfs/206 has it's own mkfs filter:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00777.html


And why is this patch not merged?



It was never reviewed.

--Mark.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:  Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:  Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]