| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs corrupted |
| From: | Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu <katmai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:02:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131015213447.40d05ea0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1381826507281-35009.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015203434.2f336fd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <525D8D67.2090301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015213447.40d05ea0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 |
-m maxmem
Specifies the approximate maximum amount of memory, in
megabytes, to use for xfs_repair. xfs_repair has its own internal block
cache which will scale out up to the lesser of the processâs virtual
address limit or about 75% of the systemâs physical RAM.
This option overrides these limits.
NOTE: These memory limits are only approximate and may use more than the specified limit. I set this at 3 gb limit, but it's at 2.5 gb of swap already used and still going up :/ On 15/10/2013 21:34, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:45:59 +0200 vous Ãcriviez:What worries me is that i see 100 % cpu usage, some 74 % memory usage (i have 4 gb ram) but there is no disk activity at all. I was thinking that it would be at least some reads if the xfs_repair is doing something.What does "iostat -mx 5" output looks like? Is there a lot of IO wait? Or just no activity at all? Nothing in dmesg output? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs corrupted, Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs corrupted, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs corrupted, Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu |
| Next by Thread: | xfs corruption - structure need cleaning, Roy Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |