| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 31/55] libxfs: switch over to xfs_sb.c and remove xfs_mount.c |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:15:38 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1378332359-14737-32-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1378332359-14737-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1378332359-14737-32-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 09/04/13 17:05, Dave Chinner wrote: From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Now that the kernel code has split the superblock specific code out of xfs_mount.c, we don't need xfs_mount.c anymore. Copy in xfs_sb.c and remove xfs_mount.c Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> --- user equivalent of the for Linux 3.12 kernel patch 20/49. This patch leaves xfs_sb.c/xfs_sb.h difference. For example in xfs_sb.h the user header is missing the project inode test in xfs_is_quota_inode(). Shouldn't xfs_sb.[ch] synced to the kernel files at this point? --Mark. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 40/55] xfs: make struct xfs_perag kernel only, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 41/55] xfs: Introduce a new structure to hold transaction reservation items, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 31/55] libxfs: switch over to xfs_sb.c and remove xfs_mount.c, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 31/55] libxfs: switch over to xfs_sb.c and remove xfs_mount.c, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |