Re: [PATCH 06/12] xfs: fix the comment of xfs_extent_busy_update_extent()

[Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>]

On 08/11/13 22:14, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> index 85e9f87..4ad8fee 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_search(
>    * extent.  If the overlap covers the beginning, the end, or all of the busy
>    * extent, the overlapping portion can be made unbusy and used for the
>    * allocation.  We can't split a busy extent because we can't modify a
> - * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entries block
> + * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entrie's block
                                                              ^^^^^^
                                                 changed that to entry's
>    * number or length.
>    *
>    * Returns true if the extent can safely be reused, or false if the search