Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive

To:	stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive
From:	Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 19:20:08 +0100
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rG2AVrUe7h+xoigPK3v87/YhxN9076XavbjmlW/EBIc=; b=uD2ikY4JFZWNWGCSkYXaKtzUDueZfFNyC3XNRKwrRocLXUSmYYFIDEZrZRgPdIxw2h /WdDPiyYVApUQIh6O3WOtZLD5yNtx34kv6Xt7mf+CI3KBZIqYrhQSXw4Dt3N100syNwo E6BHHP+egkZZdSubFn2IU6gPR+hMj552ooUGdx9XBCUuEjJTRQbN8Z8hNOAF9ZuGPEKv cr65ghZHnTvP5LbZSJK9DrKuCVtBUadxHMhXGjDTOKSBr+JAXz6eJQgRFLye8tyaC0cW b6TvHCxMBjPVf9ax/HcY5uyOVP0HAAGeVumhcgpDCmoCaUSoyYEd/EwrQPgpeNEnbvdc B9Wg==
In-reply-to:	<51F0AB56.7020705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20130724143208.34b77534@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130724235739.GR19986@dastard> <51F0AB56.7020705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 07/25/2013 05:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

AFAIK there are no native 4K sector drives on the market yet.  All of
the currently shipping models with physical 4K sectors are "Advanced
Format" drives.  The Advanced Format standard specifies 4K physical
sectors -internal- to the drive, but with traditional 512B LBA addressing.


There are some (SAS) drives that do only 4K sectors. Not sure how popular they 
are,

Ric

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive, Ric Wheeler <= Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive, Stan Hoeppner Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive, Stan Hoeppner

Previous by Date:	[PATCH, RFC] xfs: don't verify checksum on non-V5 superblocks, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 48/49] xfs: Add read-only support for dirent filetype field, Geoffrey Wehrman
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH, RFC] xfs: don't verify checksum on non-V5 superblocks, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 091, 240, 268 fix for xfs on 4k sector hard drive, Stan Hoeppner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]