| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:15:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linxu-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130726161235.GK3111@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1373396847-7975-1-git-send-email-jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130726161235.GK3111@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 7/26/13 11:12 AM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Josef,
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> I test some of the different mkfs options for btrfs, one set doesn't work
>> properly with small file systems, so the fs won't mount. This is fine from a
>> btrfs point of view, but tests that fail to mount the scratch fs will run
>> anyway, so if it's a "fill the fs" sort of test this will wreak havoc. To
>> fix
>> this just error out of _scratch_mount fails. Thanks,
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I noticed that this change causes dmapi tests to try to be run on systems that
> don't have dmapi supported, and they fail. Have you seen this?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
I haven't tested either way, but does:
_mount -t $FSTYP `_scratch_mount_options $*` || _fail "Scratch mount
failed"
work any better?
-Eric
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails, Josef Bacik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails, Josef Bacik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |