xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck

from [Mark Tinguely] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:29:52 -0500
Cc: çææ <yongtaofu@xxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51CC460F.2060402@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CADFMGu+eJ+skfYHZY8FVV8y2fqjEuRR4LAGPE2BMgYCoMu73wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51CC460F.2060402@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 
On 06/27/13 09:02, Brian Foster wrote:

On 06/26/2013 11:20 PM, çææ wrote:

Dear Brian and xfs experts,

Recently we have encountered an issue related to xfs. The log reports xfs
soft lockup stuck which is similar to this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6287

I wan to ask a question. Is this issue already been fixed in kernel 358 or
not(BZ#921961, BZ#896224)?



Both of those bz's have metadata that shows the fixed-in release. The
latter is a backport that notes the fix being pulled back into
kernel-2.6.32-358.4.1.el6.

Brian



Thank you very much.


<trace back deleted>

Do you have a core?
I am looking at something that may be related to this bug in a round about way. 

--Mark.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck, Brian Foster
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 14/15] xfs: dquot log reservations are too small, Mark Tinguely
Previous by Thread:  Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck, Brian Foster
Next by Thread:  [PATCH 00/15] xfs: patchset for 3.11, Dave Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]