Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2

[Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>]

On 05/16/2013 03:30 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> > On 05/15/2013 10:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching issues.
> > > He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have this
> > > problem.  Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the device
> > > to fsck.  Thanks,
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > Hi Josef,
> >
> > Looks like it fails test 19 , are we supposed to see failures for ext4
> > and xfs?
> Yeah that's what I was seeing, if you run the fsync tester without the reboot
> option and look at the file itself it should match the md5sum thats in the good
> output.  Thanks,
>
> Josef
Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>