| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:24:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Subranshu Patel <spatel.ml@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5157493A.1040406@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAEUQceh-Xcabr0KErxF6EAdafDDP1PY_AeHwgYB82QeUdyGp-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5147E360.10605@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5148037B.5010706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20130319_091205_759083_BA6F1AD2) <201303190924.29362.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <51483A7D.9050202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5156DF72.1090703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5157237A.40006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <51573461.8070006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5157493A.1040406@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 3/30/2013 3:21 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I didn't need it verbatim, just wondered. I agree, private emails > probably should stay that way, w/o permission otherwise. The link is dead. I did this simply to show I wasn't pulling things outta thin air and that my info was now correct, and because Ted provided a lot of insight I didn't parrot in my post. As long as nobody copy/pasted that content anywhere it should only be 'public' in the gray matter of a few folks on this list, as it shouldn't have been archived by any bots, even though the dead link has been. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Help with XFS in VMs on VMFS, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | System Administrator, Troncale, Mary |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |