| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ideal RAID-1 Stripe Size for IMAP Server ? |
| From: | Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:34:38 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <62DA4B79-7B29-4D9E-A756-FEC6838E5106@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <D991F48F-6D86-4199-9762-698DD7A61895@xxxxxxxx> <512607C5.9060004@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <62DA4B79-7B29-4D9E-A756-FEC6838E5106@xxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
schrieb Svavar Örn Eysteinsson: > I thought so just after sending this email to the group. > But the ACU(Array Configuration Utility) gives me the option of changing the > stripe size > and gives me 256 as default. > > So that is irrelevant on RAID1 completely ? > It should be, yes. I would guess it becomes relavant if you later decide that you want to expand to a RAID-10 or (shrug) RAID-5. Generally, a small stripe size (like 64k) should be beneficial for random access patterns like on a mail server. hth, Michael |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ideal RAID-1 Stripe Size for IMAP Server ?, Svavar Örn Eysteinsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfsprogs: Fix possible unallocated memory access in fiemap, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ideal RAID-1 Stripe Size for IMAP Server ?, Svavar Örn Eysteinsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfsprogs: Fix possible unallocated memory access in fiemap, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |