| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Volume fine on x86_64, corruption on ARM |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:21:06 -0600 |
| Cc: | Lluís Batlle i Rossell <viric@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5106FF76.6080102@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130127225258.GA2287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5106FDA5.80409@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130128224013.GK2287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5106FF76.6080102@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 1/28/2013 4:45 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/28/13 4:40 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: >> I run: >> mkfs.xfs /dev/sdb1 >> >> Then I copied files to it. > > On the x86_64 machine, right. Just to be sure, can you do an xfs_repair > on x86_64 to be sure it's clean at this point? Worth considering, the move may not be the problem but simply a manifestation of it. Creating the filesystem directly on the Shiva plug and testing it may be instructive at this point as well. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3] xfstests 295: test xfs direct IO nested transaction deadlock, Eryu Guan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dog supply, 3U Pet Supply |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Volume fine on x86_64, corruption on ARM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Volume fine on x86_64, corruption on ARM, Phillip Lougher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |