| To: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | in 3.7 kernel, how does 1GB page tables for kernel pagetables affect XFS? |
| From: | Linda Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:47:44 -0800 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
Given that XFS relies on the page size for it's maximum block size, does switching to 1GB pages for kernel pagetables allow for larger page-size use in XFS -- and therefore, larger blocksize? Is it something that might be in the not too distant future? ;-) ...just wistful curiosty... ;-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] xfs: make use of xfs_calc_buf_res() in xfs_trans.c, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] xfs: add a helper to figure out the space log reservation per item, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs_fsr / xfs_swap_extents() broken in 3.8-rc4?, Torsten Kaiser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: in 3.7 kernel, how does 1GB page tables for kernel pagetables affect XFS?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |