| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?) |
| From: | Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:13 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <508E3940.4080200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <508554AF.5050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50865453.5080708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <508958FF.4000007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121025211047.GD29378@dastard> <508A600C.1020109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <508B092E.6070209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121028234802.GE4353@dastard> <508E3940.4080200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
Le 29/10/2012 09:07, Yann Dupont a écrit : Hello dave. That is THE question. My intent was to test with and without LVM. But right now I can't , because all my disks are consumed by lvm. In fact my test setup hasn't even enough space to locally clone the volume where I have errors. I only have 146 sas disks on this machine. whoooops read 146 GB sas disksIf I really had 146 sas disks on that machine I shouldn't have disk space problems :) Cheers, -- Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?), Yann Dupont |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | **Alert Notification!!!, Webmail Communications |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?), Yann Dupont |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfsdump: Revert dump version bump for 32bit projid fix, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |