| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support? |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:54:57 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20120611132932.GA18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4FD5643F.5070801@xxxxxxxxx> <20120611132932.GA18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 6/11/2012 8:29 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > The maximum block size of a XFS filesystem is 64kiB. But in linux it's limited > to the PAGE_SIZE value. Correct. > so, on x86 architectures, the maximum block size is > 4kiB. Not entirely correct. Since ~1996, 16 years ago, PPro and higher 32bit CPUs with PSE/PSE36 support pages of 4MB, or 2MB with PAE enabled. x86-64 CPUs in long mode also support a 2MB page size. But the problem of internal fragmentation may outweigh the TLB and other benefits of these very large pages. I'm not an MM dev so I can't elaborate further. There may be other issues. > although it could benefit from a 16kiB page size, you'll need to be running an > operating system which supports this page size value. And AFAIK the kernel MM team doesn't have x86 2MB pages on their radar. Or do they? -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support?, Carlos Maiolino |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support?, Carlos Maiolino |
| Next by Thread: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support?, Carlos Maiolino |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |